j.issn.1000-0682.2021.01.020]
点击复制

制氧空压机喘振原因分析与解决对策

《工业仪表与自动化装置》[ISSN:1000-0682/CN:61-1121/TH]

Author(s):: WANG Xiaobin; Maintenance Engineering Department of Hong Xing Iron & Steel Co. ,Ltd .of JISCO, Gansu Jiayuguan 735100,China

摘要:: 为了研究三制氧空压机喘振问题原因，采用排除和比对测试方法，在空压机喘振停机后热态及冷态情况分别做了调节阀在100%~50%行程范围内动作情况和气动薄膜调节阀全开和全关行程时间测试、DCS控制信号突变实验，获得一级导叶机械部件在45.5%至43.5%阀位范围内存在卡滞现象和二级导叶机械限位与空压机最初投运时防喘振实验报告中限位不符的结果，排除空压机喘振是仪表故障引起的可能性，得到空压机两次喘振停机原因分别为一级导叶卡滞及二级导叶限位开度太小的结论，最终提出解决对策。

Abstract:: In order to study the reason of surge in three oxygen air compressor, the operation condition of regulating valve in 100%~50% travel range, the full open and close travel time test of pneumatic film regulating valve and the mutation experiment of DCS control signal were done by means of elimination and comparison test. It is obtained that the mechanical components of the first stage guide vane are stuck in the range of 45.5% to 43.5% valve position and that the mechanical limit of the second stage guide vane does not conform to the limit in the anti-surge experiment report when the air compressor was initially put into operation, eliminate the possibility that the air compressor surge is caused by the instrument failure, the conclusion is obtained that the two surge shutdown reasons of the air compressor are the first stage guide vane jam and the second stage guide vane limit opening is too small, and finally the solution is put forward.

[1] 孔海心.21 000 m3/h制氧空压机轴位移故障分析及解决方法[J].冶金动力,2016(01):24-26+29.

[2] 吴鹏.离心式空压机喘振控制方法介绍[J].压缩机技术,2019(03):42-45.

[3] 李俊.空压机防喘振系统控制方法的研究[D]. 乌兰巴托:内蒙古科技大学,2019.

[4] 张勇,苗如华,刘丽华.西门子智能电气阀门定位器调试及常见故障分析[J].中国石油和化工标准与质量,2018,38(17):173-174.

[5] 王树青,乐嘉谦.自动化与仪表工程师手册[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2010.

[6] 林波.离心式压缩机防喘振控制[J].化工管理,2020(09):166-167.

[7] 景秀.化工机械设备的管理与维修[J].化学工程与装备,2020(03):202-203.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01